If Vitter had a problem with it, the time to bring it up was last year when he was asked "Are these forms OK? Cause if they're not it'll cost hundreds of millions to fix. So we're good, right?" Why didn't he ask then? Was he too distracted by prostitutes or has this illegals question (a matter of long settled case law - they're included in the census until the Constitution is amended or the Supreme Court overturns a lot of precedent) just suddenly appeared?Seriously, you're just fine with wasting half a billion dollars on a meaningless question - since citizenship has absolutely no legal impact on apportionment? I bet you call yourself a "Republican Conservative" too.