Kristen stewart feet pics, kourtney kardashian topless, robert pattinson kristen stewart fanfiction,

Senjit · Guest

I'm certainly not going to defend the job the Democratic Congress has done in general, but it's still wildly hypocritical for people to just now start complaining about huge deficits, corporate welfare, and the erosion of civil liberties, considering we had much worse examples of these from 2001 and before.
"where you from?"Apparently you shouldnt ask a man where is from if you are not ready to fight :P =AWESOME

Princelin · Guest

“i think the reason why the Ad is so annoying is because of the BIG head on the left, like he's staring at my right hand...or sth..

Kimotoe · Guest

Re: "The review goes a bit further and points out that, to account for all the possible issues, a fully relativistic MOND hypothesis must be derivedâ€”for MOND, or any new theory of gravity, to be taken seriously it must contain, as a subset, Einstein's theory of general relativity."And this is precisely where they consistently go wrong. If you're going to go out of your way to consider MOND, then why constrain your investigation to MOND theories which only support Relativity? Why do they not also revisit the Dayton Miller experiment that generated a non-null result for an aether drift? Given the precision of electronics today, it would make a lot of sense to try to replicate Miller's experiment with a non-hostile, open mind. The simple explanation for why this is not being done pertains to the continuing heresy associated with questioning strongly entrenched, long-held, established views pertaining to Einstein. Some physics textbooks go so far as to claim that people who believe in Dayton Miller's aether experiments are quacks, even as quantum physicists publish press releases explaining that they can light a light bulb with "energy from the vacuum". The arguments supposedly disqualifying the aether were in fact incredibly weak. Even Einstein himself held out for a replication of Miller's aether drag experiment. But ultimately, Einstein's followers would decide not to follow up on that successful experiment, instead declaring that the aether was dead in a research review paper. Nowadays, Einstein's followers eagerly ridicule the notion of a unified field theory (like an Electrically Modified Newtonian Dynamics, aka EMOND). They fail to acknowledge that Einstein himself came up with the idea. The history of science is not always a straight, narrow, forged path lacking erroneous diversions.It's really too bad that the physics establishment does not take a hard, introspective look at itself. Many great ideas are being disqualified from funding purely because of their potential for disproving the prior work of established physicists. It won't be until physicists learn to be more honest with themselves that the answers to the hardest questions mankind has ever asked will reveal themselves. Peer review is really nothing more than a group of men. It is not impervious to mistake -- even, in some instances, dramatic mistakes that have persisted for a hundred years. The history of science records many similar mistakes. Just because we have cellphones and computers now does not mean that we are now impervious to similar errors..
Then can we get our dollars back before they choke to death?!

Naturie · Guest

Wow that's creepy :)?
actually the motion controlling technology MS uses is totally different. wii uses bluetooth, natal uses video capture... not like they took a wiimote and slapped an xbox logo on it. Plus, the motion control idea is an industry changing development, do you really expect MS and sony to just kick back and let nintendo control the entire market ? please.

Acszarka · Guest

"There's no need for "serious movement" for something that probably doesn't exist."Our science (the same type that launches space shuttles) indicates that it does exist and has advocated this view for at least the last 30 years."I'd gladly see things like that explored and implemented."For what and at what cost? We never have, do not and can never live natively in space, so why do we need multi-hundred-billion dollar space infrastructure? "Space is cool" etc, but why should we spend so large on something whose scientific benefits do not represent a solution for Earthly survivability per se?Yet, I assume from your denier standpoint, that you'd object to the same amount of money being spent to attempt to rectify the survivability of our own biosphere when the accumulated science tells us it needs our immediate attention?

Apurva · Guest

***** YOU DOLPHIN AND ***** YOU WHALE

Higgins · Guest

http://crackle.com/c/Penn_Says#id=2480036&ml=o ...You Fail *****

Ngwanyii · Guest

!

kristin davis nude pics